re: carls ~ us ordered to shot to kill australian
Carls
Your post was just the type I was expecting from the brian washed morons brigade who can not think for themselves
Yes the US used an atomic bomb on Japan to bring a quicker end to the war at that point the treat to Australia from Japan had already been defeated. Yes if the US had not become involved in WWII albeit late and after they themselves were attacted things MAY have worked out different. News flash for you though Carls WWII was nearly sixty years ago and just because we were allies during WWII it does not mean the US can not do what ever it likes and is always right.
As for your assumptions about me I could not give a rats arse what you think and you also could not be more wrong if you tried, if you cared to actually read what I posted before going into one of the typical US is great raves I stated I was not defending the d!ckhead protestors.
We are Australians and we are very capable of taking care of our own problems.
Many of these protestors types do need to be taken out the back and given a good smack in the head but we do not shot to kill protestors regardless how much we may disagree with them - is this not the type of treatment d!ckheads like you were saying we needed to save the Iraqi people from.
If you see nothing wrong with a foriegn military force shooting to kill Australians (regardless how disagreeable they may be) on Australian soil then it is you with the major problem and maybe you should f@ck off and go and live in your great US of A only problem there of course is they want let you
