US town rejects solar farm, page-14

"The cleared/shade area in an environmental context is not limited to the area of the panels alone.
The vegetation is obliterated. Any vegetation able to grow both under and AROUND the panels is affected by limited sunlight with movement of the sun throughout the day and through differing seasons. Limited hours of sunlight means limited growth.

In an environmental sense, Apple may as well be building a new 100 ACRE carpark."

again forget about the climate change argument, if 100 acres of solar panels is a blight

what are your thoughts on this 950 hectare void in prime farmland? You would be surely outraged against this.

Or is that to much of a simpleton argument for you?