This would be the stock I am leased obsessed about, its just the...

This would be the stock I am leased obsessed about, its just the only one I comment on on HC (and I'm allowed and entitled to do so).

Once again I point out - I have been right haven't I? There must be $250M down the drain in this company and there is nothing to show for it! What facts (be it technical or commercial) about their systems do you have?!

So the real question is - why haven't people arguing the point (against mine) changed their mind?

I am interested in all things business/commerce and stories like Enron, Fyre Festival, Firepower etc are incredibly interesting. Carnegie is just another example, playing out right in front of ASIC and still taking "investor" money - all without any facts being published and with literally no chance of being commercialised.

I'm fascinated to know what it actually takes to make someone that hopes a company will be a success (because the concept is awesome) logically conclude that it is a) not a concept that will turn into reality anytime soon and b) there is a high likelihood that the Directors, Officers and Execs of CCE have know for more than a decade they have nothing and no prospects!

Surely an "investor" needs to be able to know when they should exit a bad investment? How can anyone justify putting more into this mythical technology? They even called it "CETO"!

Don't question me - question your own rationale and logic!