I dont see what the problem is with rail to port.
* If BHP doesnt come to an agreement or JV, then we got FMG.
* FMG has an open door policy.
* So all we need to do is drill a little more and get the resource up to at leat 70mill-100mill.
* At this point, mining will get a green light.
* If BHP doesnt want to give us access, with 100mill under our belt and a feasability study, whats stopping us from coming to an agreement with FMG??
* Nothing!
So all you gotta do is GET SET with your holding.
** Ive alrwady proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that EVEN IF WE DOUBLE THE EQUITY VIA A CAP RAISING, AND USE 70USD LONG TERM PRICE AND 48aud COSTS, AND 3-5MILL PRODDY, THE EPS IS VERY GOOD!
They will be profitable, even if we use less than 70USD price.
WPG did a feasability study and they have costs of 55AUD due to high transport costs (trucking)
Like I said our EPS figure is HIGH even when using conservative pricing and DOUBLING the equity!
If we dont double the equity and use say 100USD and 3-5 mill proddy, the EPS is over $1.00 per share . Look at previous posts
*** If we use $100USD as the price we get :
100USD * 1.13 = 113
113 - 48 costs = 65AUD profit per tonne
3mill tonnes : 65 * 3 = 195mill
after tax: 136.5mill net
Now we currently have 85mill shares. lets use 100mill shares instead
thats $1.36 per share (and this is 3mill proddy not 5mill)
dilute an extra 50 mill if you may:
you get $1.00 per share approximately!
So this shares worth $10.00 on a PE of 10
5mill production : 65mill rvenue per tonne * 5 = 325
after tax : 227.5
using current equity (say 100 mill again instead of 85mill)
$2.27 per share!
add another 50mill shares if you may:
227.5/135 = $1.68 per share
On a PE of 6 thats $10.00 per share valuation.
OK now lets DOUBLE the CAPITAL:
3mill tonnes - 136net profit / 170 = 80 cents per share!
5 mill tonnes - 227.5/ 170 = $1.34 per share!
So on a price of 100USD you get anywhere between 80cents per share and $1.34 per share EPS IF U DOUBLE THE CAPITAL!
*** Now u tell me this outfit isnt undervalued!
YML can easily DOUBLE its share capital and raise the funds needed via 100% equity for the project if they need to build tracks to FMGs line, and EPS is STILL 80c-$1.30 per share !!!!
you cant escape the figures
ITS UNDERVALUED AS HELL! INFRASTRUCTURE DEAL OR NO INFRASRUCTURE DEAL, ITS GROSSLY UNDERVALUED. EVEN IF YOU USE A FORWARD PE OF 5, ITS GROSSLY UNDERVALUED AND IVE ACTUALLY DOUBLED THE SHARE CAPITAL WHICH WONT REALISTICALLY HAPPEN.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- use 100usd and dble equity eps 80 to 135 cps
YML
unknown
I dont see what the problem is with rail to port.* If BHP doesnt...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add YML (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online