GM
The responsibility for the failed developement of AOD falls largely at the
feet of the original board.
At the time the company put out a paper hypothesising that oral availability was to blame for not achieving statistical significance.
There has been rodent studies confirmimg oral availability.
JV has previously made a strong case the clinical trials were bungled.
GRAS is the money option after a failed trial with no takers for funding further developement. Have a look at the unscientifically tested rubbish on the chemists shelves.
It may be academia is very wary of supporting a failed drug , even a GRAS, which should be beyond doubt after all the trial subjects.
The BB industry is doing a lot of valuable clinical trials!
They even have an improved diet regime with dose first in morning then fast and a second dose in the evening.
I have read oral needs four times the dosage of injectable.
As JV has stated a legal , mass produced cost of goods should blow the pirates out of the water.
I feel your pain GM at the time i lost a house deposit.
Biotech is high risk, remember the caveat forward looking statements etc
At least biotech is altruistic , saving lives etc.
Its not like cannabals with forks like the carbon lobby poisoning the earth for future generations.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CZD
- using because it is safe!!!
using because it is safe!!!, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)