I didn't take it that way at all, given that the statement suggesting he should have spoken to WR first ended with an exclamation mark, inferring that WR would have something to tell him. That kind of post is misleading to investors I think, unless it can be substantiated. Can it?
I didn't take it that way at all, given that the statement...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)