There is increasing evidence from many studies around the world (Kentucky USA study for one ) that once someone is infected with Covid and recovers they have the antibodies in their system that seem to recognise the Covid protein variants that are appearing and these antibodies are lasting longer and are more wide ranging than the synthetic specific to one variant antibodies that are injected through the vaccine.
That being the case why are those that have recovered still required to be vaccinated when it's benefit is next to useless?
A doctor George Mason professor of law in the USA has won a court case exempting him from the vaccine for this very reason. He recovered from Covid and his antibodies levels were higher after many months compared to the vaccinated but he was still required to be vaccinated to enter a university.
Now such a precedent should be used here and should also be tested in court as there will be 100s of thousands if not millions who will have recovered and acquired natural antibodies as the years pass.
Let's use some logic and common sense here.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Vaccinated vs Acquired Natural Immunity after recovering from Covid
Vaccinated vs Acquired Natural Immunity after recovering from Covid
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 64 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online