Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

You are assuming you survive in the first place. As there is no...

First 2 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Glug

25,791 Posts.

1

02/09/21

11:54

Post #: 55777588
Share

Originally posted by spiderman14: ↑

There is increasing evidence from many studies around the world (Kentucky USA study for one ) that once someone is infected with Covid and recovers they have the antibodies in their system that seem to recognise the Covid protein variants that are appearing and these antibodies are lasting longer and are more wide ranging than the synthetic specific to one variant antibodies that are injected through the vaccine.
That being the case why are those that have recovered still required to be vaccinated when it's benefit is next to useless?
A doctor George Mason professor of law in the USA has won a court case exempting him from the vaccine for this very reason. He recovered from Covid and his antibodies levels were higher after many months compared to the vaccinated but he was still required to be vaccinated to enter a university.
Now such a precedent should be used here and should also be tested in court as there will be 100s of thousands if not millions who will have recovered and acquired natural antibodies as the years pass.
Let's use some logic and common sense here.

Expand

You are assuming you survive in the first place.

As there is no opportunity to develop anything if you are dead.

Toss a coin.
8 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

QAN

Qantas dips on cyberattack news, but no Medibank-tier carnage

AII

Almonty Industries shares EXPLODE! Rheinmetall, Renk, and Hensoldt left in the shadows!

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 015 – Yeah, we're thinking the IPO market is back

EVR

Pilot plant next up for EVR at Los Lirios after 'promising' antimony sampling

DMP

Domino's sinks -16% in early trades as another chief player exits ship

First 2 Last

SPONSORED BY