Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Vaccinated vs Acquired Natural Immunity after recovering from Covid, page-3

First 3 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
haripin

496 Posts.

6

02/09/21

12:05

Post #: 55778021
Share

Originally posted by spiderman14: ↑

There is increasing evidence from many studies around the world (Kentucky USA study for one ) that once someone is infected with Covid and recovers they have the antibodies in their system that seem to recognise the Covid protein variants that are appearing and these antibodies are lasting longer and are more wide ranging than the synthetic specific to one variant antibodies that are injected through the vaccine.
That being the case why are those that have recovered still required to be vaccinated when it's benefit is next to useless?
A doctor George Mason professor of law in the USA has won a court case exempting him from the vaccine for this very reason. He recovered from Covid and his antibodies levels were higher after many months compared to the vaccinated but he was still required to be vaccinated to enter a university.
Now such a precedent should be used here and should also be tested in court as there will be 100s of thousands if not millions who will have recovered and acquired natural antibodies as the years pass.
Let's use some logic and common sense here.

Expand

Seems to be a Dr.Todd Zywicki , professor of Law, at The George Mason University..Lawsuit not decided yet.

regards.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

ASX Market Open: Oz shares dip back (very slightly) after Wed's record close | July 3

RML

Resolution looks to 'strong historical data' as Horse Heaven search begins

CBA

CBA down as BHP goes up – what's going on, and, will CBA stocks correct?

First 3 Last

SPONSORED BY