I like Dan's idea better. with active traders, as long as they average about 2 trades/month, then trader growth would be very accurate in measuring growth. (trader growth is a leading factor for trade growth, not the other way around).
Also, large portion of SWF revenue comes from account interest, meaning they generate revenue when users are not trading.
The business model is brilliant, and user growth measure is the best method to evaluate its performance.
I like Dan's idea better. with active traders, as long as...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SWF (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
12.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $27.86M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 12.0¢ | 12.0¢ | 12.0¢ | $3.96K | 33K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 159001 | 11.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 12.5¢ | 20000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.39pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SWF (ASX) Chart |