valuation, page-7

Cdmick, you win the dubious award as being the only person I have ever found on HC who in their total posts (in your case 49) has never been thumbed up.....I can only imagine it is because you have spelt out your well thought out valuation strategy before.

I would like to ask based on your complicated understanding of relative value stock investing which stock your model is throwing out as good value after you worked out a realistic valuation and then halved it and then halved it again?

I am concerned that perhaps you have misread your model and rather than picking bad stocks I think it has been parameterised to pick winners as you have aimlessly wandered into a thread where the conscensus is that we have a stock that will double, then double then double again.

Therefore perhaps we should be asking what other sticks you D'ONT like as the cdmick reversal model appears to have legs!