The case was bifurcated because of the wrapper. From the litigation update on Setember 19 2016:
It does look like Yowie will be taking the cash for the property against the bond (otherwise surely there would have been some motion to recover the equipment).
Yowie must have incurred some costs when it attempted to retrieve the wrapping machine and later preparing for the trial for the wrapping machine. It seems that Whetstone's attorney didn't put up any defence for the possession of the wrapping machine. I'm not a lawyer, but that doesn't seem like the sort of behaviour that should be encouraged? I hope Yowie does get some compensation for their wasted time and effort.
Valuation, page-19
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 47 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add YOW (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.734M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1500 | 2.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.8¢ | 50000 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| YOW (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable