Something doesn't make sense, because if the DR only allows a company to have up to 30K H of mineral concessions, then according to the numbers on its own website, PGI already had just under that limit of concessions due to its merger with NOV before any subsequent 'merger talks' with Goldquest. In fact, it's pretty nice the current LL tailings project must not count as much in that combined total, or else we'd have to carve something off to comply.
What might make more sense is if PGI was discussing a JV with Goldquest in order to comply with the DR limits, as it might do now with Pricipitate Gold... Or am I missing something else here?
value, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AAU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
-0.001(25.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.384M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.3¢ | $8.542K | 2.230M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | 49803037 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4¢ | 32160892 | 26 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AAU (ASX) Chart |