That's right HEG have the right to place the unexercised 55M HEGO, one assumes that they could allocate that holding to a cornerstone investor i.e. committed long-term and/or strategic - someone may be interested in a stake in a potentially very large resource base and low cost operation and $10M for that position may be very attractive.
Didn't they just appoint an experienced M&A lawyer as a director? Maybe just a coincidence?
I'm not for one moment suggesting they just throw the placement out there and leave a huge overhang in the stock.
Just my idle thoughts.
value, page-11
Add PUA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $22.96M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.9¢ | 0.9¢ | 0.9¢ | $39.47K | 4.385M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 12971996 | 0.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0¢ | 13666839 | 12 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.38pm 15/01/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PUA (ASX) Chart |
