Re "The first resolution which is the increase in price needs to be voted in, before resolution 2 can proceed. So you don't have to do what I suggested about voting Yes to #1 (price increase) and No to #2 (takeover)."
Doesn't that statement assume that everyone who votes No to Res1 will also vote No to Res2 ? To me, it is too risky to assume that - who knows what games can be played by current holders who are not necessarily acting in their own personal best interests due to, let's just say, shenanigans
RAP Price at posting:
19.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
