That's not the ROFR me and Petersburg was talking about. As for...

First 58 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Rockshell

103 Posts.

22

16/03/22

13:27

Post #: 60225261
Share

Originally posted by PulpCutter: ↑

Read 'em and weep, baby. ROFR already triggered, per Judge Martin.

Here is his ruling, with a link to the WASC Court website so you can verify it for yourself. BTW, heck of a lot more rigorous documentation than you're providing to this thread, with your unsubstantiated claims that "two Chinese billionaires" are backing Vangom LOL.

https://ecourts.justice.wa.gov.au/eCourtsPortal/Decisions/ViewDecision?returnUrl=%2feCourtsPortal%2fDecisions%2fSearch%3fsearchText%3dVango%26jurisdiction%3dSC%26advanced%3dFalse&id=f22a3712-44be-4091-90b1-d9a2a94c46ad

Paragraph 240: Consequently, at May 2017, an ROFR offer ought to have been made in parallel terms by both Vango and DPPL to Billabong Gold(DPPL in this May 2017 transaction is named as a party) to BillabongGold.

Paragraph 241: Towards this May 2017 occasion, I assess there to be a joint breach by both defendants by their omission as regards OTA cl 12.6(b)vis-à-vis Billabong Gold (albeit the second defendant is a 100%subsidiary of the first defendant, Vango).

Yeah, the ROFR has already been triggered, ace.

Expand

That's not the ROFR me and Petersburg was talking about. As for the ones you mentioned, you can look up the 2017 Jan offer from Vango or Dampier/ZAGs website. Key terms are there. Read it before you jump into any conclusions.

VAN Price at posting: 3.4¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply