I'd just note that this claiming that others are "false and...

I'd just note that this claiming that others are "false and misleading" is a Vango trait.

Here's Vango's press release claiming that Vango's loss in court to Superior wasn't really a loss:

https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/ann-wa-court-decision-on-billabong-gold-matter-received.6494327/

Here's Zuleika, officially responding to Vango claiming they didn't lose, explicitly stating they are correcting Vango's press release:

https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/ann-zag-correction-to-van-announcement-re-wasupreme-court-action.6516296/

Then here's Vango with a SECOND press release, attempting to rebut Zuleika's correction:

https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/ann-vango-response-to-zag-opinion-on-wa-court-decision.6518213/

Result? Judge makes Vango pay 80% of Superior's court costs, and awards Superior 50% buy-in on Vango's claims. VANGO LOST. That's not my opinion. It's the ruling of WASC Judge Martin.