various third parties?

tried to stay away as much as I could- this is getting so heavy in these rooms at the moment- and unfortunately doesn't even seem to be coming to any sort of fruition to getting to a resolve or getting any closer regarding revenues/ the whole performance shares situation/ more specifics on revenue of intiger etc etc etc not mention above all else there has to be something like 100's of posts trying to nit pick the whole $40npat figure
hate to say it but yes your all speclating and causing un-necessary angst amongst each other when at the end of the day I , yes me I have the answer to all of these questions and that is this- its pointless trying to fight amongst each other trying to work it out because end of the day there are only a select few parties that know the answer to that and that are the inside people- and just like the acquisition, you can sleep easy at night that we will all know when mw and the board are good and ready to let us know- its pointless trying to get your head around it from the limited information which has been given to date- after reading it numerous times I do believe that it has once again been perfectly orchestrated by Matthew Walker and the board to give just enough information to the general public ( ie basic terms of the acquisition and main points about the business and people of intiger) without given away to much too soon- I do have a strong inkling that the pr team at srt definantly saw all of the pressure and heat that was out there should srt had missed the before Christmas deadline ( this a announcement there) and even more so was aware of a huge sell down should they have missed there target of informing the market just last week- it is why I say this, the srt boards have runs on the board because they are the business and know how to let these things unfold

I do have a feeling that the information given to the market was done to meet expectations on the announcement coming and not to mention that I also feel that they somewhat forced to announce what they had on Thursday due to that smh newspaper article getting leaked at 12.24am that morning- With that said, hold firm- The way that the announcement sounded was that it was only a lead up to get the market interested and informed- letting the discussion commence. Once that has ensued, than in the coming weeks if not weeks the specifics will come out and we will most defiantly get the whole picture painted in black and white without any ambiguity- Mw's biggest sell to date, you can bet your bottom dollar that he as this one on a flow chart and it all has stages- stage one has been achieved starting the discussion ( as hot copper's highest discussed post pointed to yesterday, and igh again today) not to mention already being mentioned in three newspapers- the rest of the story with specifics on intiger, partners, revenue, profit etc etc is when it starts to get serious and starts to talk to the market that this is what you needed to know before you invest so here it is- try not investing about being blown away with those numbers - so please lets all just give it time here because clearly from what I have read, we really are not helping anybody jumping down each others throats and if anything we are losing valuable insight from valuable posters that clearly have chosen to sit back from the angst ie ff m17 and gladiator =, which I know is on holidays but still, clearly last place id like to jump in on with all the tension and heat

with so many posts going on about the whole $40npat how/what/when etc etc give it time- opinions have been raised and im almost certain that srt pr team frequent this threads so im sure this matter will be addressed so give it time- what I would like to raise is a critical matter away from the npat topic and that being the whole point many have left to just be left alone- that being the whole various third parties" comment - clearly mw would not of gone into depth about our various third parties in a standalone announcement to the market if it didn't have any significance to this transaction - I do believe the missing link of the various third parties might also be another cleaver manoeuvre by the board to leave out of our announcement to be the ammunition it needed in a follow up announcement once the required churn and cap raising talk was done -

in conclusion I would like to raise a point that I have noticed hasn't been mentioned already but the more I think about the wording of it makes me wonder if there is more to it they way it is worded- srt will acquire a 100% in EACH of the the following
1. Intiger Asset Management pty ltd
2. Intiger Process Enhancements
3. Intiger Asset Management ( Hong Kong Company)
4. Tiger 2 limited (Hong Kong Company)
5. Lion 2 Business Processes( Philippine Company)

srt will also indirectly acquire 100% of INTEGRA asset management Australia, a subsidiary of intiger asset management

unfortunately limited information out there but am I the only one thinking that there could be more leading into the wording of this of not ?