Share
241 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 81
clock Created with Sketch.
03/08/18
10:46
Share
Originally posted by Area51
↑
To put the argument to bed, on the $90m in the Baillieu report: $30m is payable on commercial production, with further $60m from cashflow from production. $20M debt which is already pending will fund the project to production according to the disclosure.
Therefore; this $90m is NOT attributed to the Market Cap or EV currently. Fullstop. It is an agreed amount or for simplicity "earn-in" type of arrangement for Fimosa.
Things that will and can be considered to the Market cap and EV are:
1) Asset value - current projects (tenements etc..) plant and equipment. Once the ~estimated $70m of plant on site, is secured and valued, it will be an asset on the books.
2) debt - if the $20m debt is secured it can be added to the Market Cap.
To suggest that $90m value, which most is paid out of future potential profits post-production is part of today's MC, is simply incorrect, misleading and shows lack of basic valuation and metrics.
Valution 101: first grade: MC =EV + debt - cash
Hopes this cleans up this thread and allows proper valuation discussions here.
Expand
HAC was obviously intentionally trying to mislead vulnerable punters on this thread and destabilise the stock with his childish valuation. Surely no one could be this stupid. I hope no one bought into it and sold in a panic.