Wow now you are really making a mess of this.
I will make a correction to a previous post as I am rather silly for using the term Heat instead of Temperature when used with gravity. So any confusion for that I will cop.
Tristanc you have just claimed that the lapse rate is not a result of gravity. Have you just lost your marbles?
"In reality, it doesn’t even explain why the atmosphere has a temperature gradient." is what you said.
I suspected for awhile that you indeed believe that the Lapse rate is a result of your version of the Greenhouse effect. But you were reluctant to make that open as it does complicate your version of the science. But you have just confirmed that now.
disclaimer. In saying that the ghg machine is re-framing the definition of the Greenhouse effect. It is almost now in fact mirroring what gravity can do all by itself. This is the slime ball tactics employed by the machine.
Gravity is constantly working our atmosphere. I dont see meteorologist factoring in Greenhouse gases when ascertaining lapse rates or using the Ideal Gas Law. DO YOU Tristanc?
But GRAVITY is used everyday to determine the temperature gradient that YOU SAY gravity cannot explain. Bit of a contradiction here hey TRISTANC.
I wonder what science explains it best. mmm. tristanc or meterologist?
You also make other statements as if I disagree with you? What are you playing at with childish sheet like that.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Venus and the Greenhouse Effect
Wow now you are really making a mess of this. I will make a...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 128 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
BGD
BARTON GOLD HOLDINGS LIMITED
Alex Scanlon, Managing Director & CEO
Alex Scanlon
Managing Director & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online