Very dissapointing, page-43

You're probably right here, cashman, depending on your definition of 'ages'. I've asked the following question in the past: "...what the approval process looks like for an existing Cook product/application where M&G is added to the manufacture? It seems logical this would get things to production much quicker in an established market, assuming the product/application has good uptake."

The indication I received was (paraphrasing) the addition of anything to an existing product would require some amount of regulatory work. Given that M&G will be going inside living things, M&G would need to be proven to be non-toxic or that it doesn't come off (or both). This could take as little as 6 months but could be longer depending upon what the regulatory body (FDA in the case of Cook) requires.

So, aggressively 6 months from the start of the trial to determine feasibility and FDA approval would be roughly September for some sort of update/ann on results. Realistically, I have no idea what is a reasonable expectation of time, but 6 months doesn't seem reasonable to me when the FDA is involved. The thing that is encouraging to me on this one is, as per the ann back in March, the trials are with existing Cook applications:

“Anteo will be formally assessing an opportunity to apply Anteo’s patented Mix&Go technology to one of Cook’s portfolio applications." - GC​