440,000 Indicative orders were based on a working Roam E, in my...

440,000 Indicative orders were based on a working Roam E, in my opinion it had nothing to do with blades but had everything to do with it not functioning correctly. They could not get it to function correctly. If they had been honest and up front with potential buyers in my opinion they (the potential buyers) would have never ever suggested they would buy this product. But instead they did not tell them the truth and subsequently released an announcement to share holders that they had indicative orders of 440,000 units, this is where I believe they mislead shareholders and should be taken to task over it and I am surprised they haven't been already. Do I care they haven't been taken to task over it, No. This is just my opinion.