Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Clearly it is beyond your intellect to comprehend that there is...

First 21 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
AmbrosePethick

18,122 Posts.

04/08/24

13:47

Post #: 75062589
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag: ↑

Dutton said he would take the Voice to a referendum himself in order to have it abolished if the Voice won the referendum.

the LibNats said Yes to the Voice for popularity, and then said No to the Voice for political points against the Labor party.

the constitutional placement was all the excuse they needed. a MP who had Aboriginal needs and the better management of laws pertaining directly to Aboriginal people on the top of their mind would not have taken the 'opportunity' but would have supported the Voice in line with the productivity comm report. the reasoning there was solid and sound.

but of course party politicians don't have best management in mind; they have only party point scoring as their priority.

Expand

Clearly it is beyond your intellect to comprehend that there is a significant difference between Parliament abolishing something (ATSIC) and a Referendum to remove something (the voice) from the Constitution.
11 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

FBR

FBR's robotic home construction tech passes first US early-stage structural compliance check

GL1

Global Lithium latest hit by lithium downturn; shares fall -10% as Manna DFS paused

FRB

Firebird snaffles Environmental Permit for Jinshi plant

DUR

Duratec snags $76.5M in works from Woodside and Defence respectively - including spy network upgrade

SDF

Steadfast Group sees $600M wiped off on resumed trades after Four Corners feature

There are more pages in this discussion • 64 more messages in this thread...

First 21 Last