With a successful NO vote, the board and Hartree are unlikely to put us into VA, the board would lose their jobs and Hartree would lose control.
I reckon Hartree will have to come back with a better deal that doesn't include those squillions of free shares and control of the company.
It's like we've been in VA for over 2 years anyway, unable to trade out and faced with losing a lot of money. So I'm not scared of it.
Actually VA would provide a neat solution:
- The mine is likely to continue running, if it is cashflow positive as the chairman says
- Debt repayments to Hartree can be suspended, for as long as it takes, so incoming cash can be spent on the operation
- Administrators can choose not to perform the offtake agreement, can sell it elsewhere and use revenue to strengthen the operation and then repay Hartree
- We'd get rid of the current board that has taken us from disaster to disaster and is now hopelessly owned by Hartree.
-Administrators may pursue other deals, like the merger proposal we heard about. A merger with a listed company means shareholders could trade out or stay as part of a larger successful company
- Given the solid NPV and company valuation in the IER, and cashflow positive mine, the administrators should be able to arrange a recapitalization and repayment of the debt, with relisting of the company in due course, say <12 months.
Hartree won't have control, our shares will be worth something.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Voluntary administration would be a neat solution
With a successful NO vote, the board and Hartree are unlikely to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MYL (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online