vote of no confidence against gillard "labor", page-7

  1. 8,527 Posts.
    I'd allege, surmise, guess - Bob Carr?

    He hugely puffed up with his own importance, IMO. And would have the "in power" clout, and Government connections, to
    get away with it.

    If this is the case, with Labor now manipulating century old Parliamentary traditions and requirements, seemingly all to it's own advantage, here we have a very dangerous example of these Marxists now doing Machiavellian manoeuverings allegedly entirely to forward their own agendas.

    It'd be outrageous. Who the hell is it who's agreeing to such
    alleged murky deviousness? and why can't the Opposition complain?

    Seems Gillard thinks she can do - and engender - anything she likes. Her middle finger always raised at all of us "chumps". What, drunk with power, she feels?

    Dreyfus and Emerson always running out to prop her up - whenever she stumbles?
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.