vote on mining, page-56

Nuna document.

Suppose it confirms that nothing has changed officially.
One fair thing about holding GGG stock is that holders know the risk regarding uranium mining in Greenland. That's good.

Sooner or later, the risk will be confirmed.

In the meantime holders have to weigh up .. was the minister's statement his true opinion and will that be the directive he will push for eventually. Did he make a political mistake by making the statement (as opposed to a policy mistake)Perhaps he should have kept his mouth shut but in saying what he said did he let the cat out of the bag.

Fact is we don't know, and this new gov't might eventually be swayed.

BUT I understand, the new govt. got elected on a strong anti uranium stance, several members have a strong anti uranium position, the public is pretty much cultured towards anti uranium ..... been like that for many many YEARS.

I think it is nieve to believe that this will all change in the coming Autumn sitting. Probably a year or two away at least.


Something fishy about this Westrip case. Might have some info soon.