Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

VTG

Click for more information

0.00%

8.1¢ vita group limited

I thought that VTG owned the majority of its stores? Lumpy

First 4 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Lumpy Pom

307 Posts.

28/06/17

08:22

Post #: 25529013
Share

Originally posted by somuchwolf ↑

Most of their leases would have clauses in them requiring the retail Banner to remain as a Telstra store.
Landlords want to maintain a premium environment therefore don't want their tenants to simply change from a 'premium' telstra store to a 'Crazy Jims $2 Phone Cover' shop overnight...
in saying that, the landlords relationship is with their tenant (ie. VTG not Telstra), so they would generally want to maintain a good relationship with VTG and be open to potential changes which help improve / or save their retail business - no big landlord wants a tenant going into administration... 100 stores of missing rent will add up pretty quickly.

i'm banking on the fact that VTG will doing everything in its power to continue a profitable relationship with TLS.
and that TLS will do everything in its power to improve its profitability with VTG, without putting them in a tenuous position or harming their consumer image.

and that, my friends, is the basis of my sentiment.

Expand

I thought that VTG owned the majority of its stores?

Lumpy

VTG Price at posting: $1.01 Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

NIM

Nimy to raise $1.21M to explore 'newsy' WA targets

Bitcoin investors need to know the risks

AII

Almonty locks in govt agreement for tungsten oxide plant in South Korea

MDI

Nanocap Middle Island Resources kicks off Barkly copper-gold drill run – a potential IOCG-style NT project

I88

Infini soars 50% as company reveals it could’ve just made uranium history – redefining what it means to be “high grade”

First 4 Last

Add VTG (ASX) to my watchlist