Wouldn't CAT want to be heading towards owning/controlling the tech behind DST/HX? Whereas Wienerberger would be more likely to take a partner/supplier role? If FBR wanted to sell the IP for short term gain, then CAT would seem to be the better partner, whereas if they want to keep the IP (and the long term benefits that entails) then Wienerberger would be the better partner. That's how it seems in my mind anyhow!
Wouldn't CAT want to be heading towards owning/controlling the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FBR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
4.6¢ |
Change
0.006(15.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $205.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 4.2¢ | 4.9¢ | 4.1¢ | $537.7K | 11.90M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 972221 | 4.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8¢ | 1521697 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 24/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FBR (ASX) Chart |