WAF (ASX) WAF valuation

Originally posted by davo_85 ↑

Originally posted by nordesmic
Yes but more than 50% of the open pit reserves at Sanbrado are from oxides which have a low processing cost. Mana on the other hand appears to be heavily weighted (almost solely) toward sulphides. If you look at the detail in Table 21.1 of the Mana Technical report it actually shows oxide processing costs as ~US$13/t. Recoveries for the Mana project average 86% vs 93% for Sanbrado.

So if you build in those two factors then the WAF processing cost doesn’t look that different at all. This just further proves my point that no two operations are identical so you really need to dig into the detail.

View attachment 1405107
Nordesmic, youquestion the mill operating cost assumption… examples are provided to validate.

You question theexamples and suggest alternatives… alternative examples are provided (SEMAFO -Mana).

You then go on tosay that the example you suggested isn’t actual a valid reference (you shouldhave checked this before you suggested it).

You then providethe cost table from the WAF NI43-101 that provides a breakdown of the millingcosts used in the Reserve estimate for the various material types.

This table is agood starting point to understand the actual milling unit costs that WAF arelikely to incur.

If you look atthe unit cost for different material types and then apply these costs to themill feed schedule as stated in the NI43-101 (WAF: “It is estimated that the average feed composition to the plant willcomprise of 58.9% oxide and 41.9% fresh/transitional material”) you get aweighted cost of $15.45/t as per table below that provides a summary of this.

It is then important to read Section 17 of the NI43-101 where WAF state that the design basis for the mill will be suitable for the first four years of production. After which the percentage of feed from fresh material increases, increased energy is required to break the rock, throughput drops and by the very nature of fixed costs the reduced throughput results in the unit fixed costs going up.

Let me simplifyit, and this is all from the WAF NI43-101 and not based on my own assumptions:

1. Themilling unit costs WAF use in their cash flow model =

$12.50/t

2. Thetonnes weighted unit costs (58.9%/41.9% blend) using WAF’s cost estimate foreach type of material =

$15.45/t

3. WAFstate “From years 5 to 11, the feeddeviates from the 58.9/41.9% design blend with higher design specific energiesand reduced throughputs evident during those years”.

If this doesn’tsway you, you just have to look at the mill indexes stated in the NI43-101 of>20kWh/t for fresh rock and you can make a reasonable assumption that themill throughput will be less than the stated throughput (as the design blend is only relevant to years 1-4) and the milling costsare going to be significantly more than $15/t.

So, my point isthis, WAF use a spread of unit milling cost to complete their Reserves ($11.30/t - $20.42/t), they then use a significantly lower unit milling cost in their cash flow model which doesn't align with their blend schedule. And by WAF’s own admissionthe blend is going to be significantly different to the design blend for 7 outof 11 years that project is in operation.

Another thing toconsider is that the focus of exploration and grade control drilling over thenext 18-24 months will be to bring online more M1 underground high grade. Thisto is fresh rock and will further sway the milling unit costs higher.

Expand

"further sway the milling costs higher"

Yes but you are likely adding mill feed with a grade of ~13 g/t.

Now is anyone still wondering how determined the dark forces are. Looks to me they want to get this down to 20 cents by any means. Hard to watch. Esh

No.	Vol.	Price($)
3	20315	$1.50

No.

Vol.

Price($)

20315

$1.50

Price($)	Vol.	No.
$1.51	22893	5

Price($)

Vol.

No.

$1.51

22893

No.	Vol.	Price($)
1	2025	1.500
2	28660	1.495
5	76973	1.490
3	59757	1.485
3	50046	1.480

No.

Vol.

Price($)

2025

1.500

28660

1.495

76973

1.490

59757

1.485

50046

1.480

Price($)	Vol.	No.
1.505	18508	4
1.510	4538	1
1.515	57304	3
1.520	15252	1
1.525	40321	4

Price($)

Vol.

No.

1.505

18508

1.510

4538

1.515

57304

1.520

15252

1.525

40321

(20min delay)
Last $1.50		Change 0.020(1.35%)		Mkt cap ! $1.705B

Open	High	Low	Value	Volume
$1.49	$1.52	$1.47	$7.074M	4.727M

WAF valuation, page-25

Shekel Brainweigh and Calmer Co lead innovations in the retail space

Infini soars 50% as company reveals it could’ve just made uranium history – redefining what it means to be “high grade”

Aldoro shares jump 47% on news of strong niobium recoveries from Namibia play

Recce scores US$2M deal from US Department of Defense for burn wound infections gel

Week 28 Wrap: ASX hits all time high; CBA shares' two realities; US inflation hits 3% ahead of China plenum

Featured News

Buyers (Bids)

Sellers (Offers)

Featured News

WAF valuation, page-25

Top Stories

Shekel Brainweigh and Calmer Co lead innovations in the retail space

Infini soars 50% as company reveals it could’ve just made uranium history – redefining what it means to be “high grade”

Aldoro shares jump 47% on news of strong niobium recoveries from Namibia play

Recce scores US$2M deal from US Department of Defense for burn wound infections gel

Week 28 Wrap: ASX hits all time high; CBA shares' two realities; US inflation hits 3% ahead of China plenum

Featured News

Buyers (Bids)

Sellers (Offers)

Featured News