Waiting waiting waiting for Sangdong, page-21

I'll waste a little time on a rebuttal point by point:

1) I observed the stock was thinly traded but at no point stated that i was unaware of that at time of entry
2) I referred to my position size as small, which somehow converts to receiving a lecture on not putting your entire portfolio in one stock
3) The investor did already know that getting out of a thinly traded stock often involves taking a bath on the investment
4) My post to which the response came was emotionally neutral
5) There were no questions asked in my post so the statement "The fact the investor is asking these questions, he is out of his depth..." is a logical non sequitur
6) Is also a logical non sequitur given it refers to controlling your emotional state when my post was emotionally neutral.

Six points were made, all without basis, leaving me wondering where they're coming from, and why they bothered.

Reaper.