element09, there is no point quoting from section 3.1 in your last post, as clauses I posted state that listing rule 3.1 DOES NOT APPLY if the three sets of conditions are met.
Your original post was about "price sensitive information", but in you last post you talk about "a confirmed discovery". Now even if Cairn report to FAR a confirmed discover upon completion of testing, Cairn could still notify FAR under the contract that they condiser the information to be a "trade secret" especially if they are currently attempting to negotiate a transaction relating to an adjacent lease. Whilst ever the discovery is deemed a trade secret and remains confidential, then listing rule 3.1 does not apply.
One could argue about whether a "reasonable person" would expect the information to be disclosed. I personally would not expect it to be disclosed if it had the potential to prejudice another commercial transaction.
FAR Price at posting:
3.9¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)