Im not sure what youre trying to achieve @giga-byte because it really doesnt seem to be about a proper discourse about the company and the direction it is heading. I dont really understand why you are trudging up things from years ago that have been dealt with and discussed at length already. Any long term holder or serious holder is already acutely aware of the companies earlier short comings and hopefully the reasons for why they happened. You can either accept the companies position on this or not, no one is here trying to force you, but if you believe the company is so horrendously bad. Why are you here?
There are some seriously bad people in companies at times, the Bayer - HIV scandal from the 80's comes to mind. That was all kinds of f*ed up. The way BP handled the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. I could go on and on about companies i would never invest a cent in even if they were a "sure thing" due to principal. It seems to me that you believe that previous management should be put in this same category for misleading shareholders, even though the entire landscape changed underneath them and they had to adapt. Do i think it could have been handled better, I sure do. But other than getting a whole new management team, making the best out of the new situation by identifying new markets and products what exactly were they supposed to do?
What are you expecting from them? SH's said this is bullshit we want things fixed and we want someone new at the helm, we got it. We want better communication, we got it. We want a road map, we got it. We want timelines that are stuck to, we got it (so far). We want this thing generating revenue, we got it. We want to see management actively doing stuff, we got it. We complained there was no interest in the shareprice, investor roadshow was put together.
The other thing that gets me is the "newness" of your account and your claims of "just come across this" nonsense. This account comes across just like several others that come and go from this forum, I can think of 2 reasons why you keep changing accounts. 1. You get banned, if thats the reason then im pretty sure creating an alt account to circumvent the ban is against the ToU of the site. 2. Your account keeps getting put on ignore by a large amount of users and as a way to get around that you create a new account so the ignores are reset. Im pretty sure that would be against to ToU as well but who could actually be bothered reading that thing.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FGL
- Wangle Please Explain
Wangle Please Explain, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add FGL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
2.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.307M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.2¢ | 2.2¢ | 2.2¢ | $1 | 41 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 200000 | 1.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.2¢ | 23809 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 200000 | 0.018 |
1 | 200000 | 0.016 |
2 | 201000 | 0.015 |
1 | 250000 | 0.014 |
2 | 318278 | 0.011 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.022 | 23809 | 2 |
0.024 | 32184 | 1 |
0.025 | 55000 | 1 |
0.026 | 41000 | 1 |
0.027 | 41000 | 1 |
Last trade - 11.35am 09/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
FGL (ASX) Chart |