Am I right in thinking this is the relevant table from the AMG resource estimate that is comparable to the estimate in this report?
The things that obviously stick out are:
1. The average grades in the Wardley estimate are more than double.
2. The new cut of grade is 0.5g/t compared to 1g/t in the Wardley report, yet the ore volumes appear comparable.
What do we make of this?
Could exclusion of some of the high grade holes be making this much difference between the estimates.
How reliable is the Wardley estimate given they were engaged by the vendors? Perhaps they may of been selective with what information they used and how it was applied?