scitty, but you're adamant that it CAN'T be 134 year's of data because things only got accurate after 1910! NOAA's data is not accurate - according to you.
Mind you, I agree with you. NOAA's data is really a complete crock. They didn't have any temperatures for the most of the Pacific, Antarctica, the Arctic, the Southern Ocean etc. 134 years ago, so how can they make a comparison?
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- wasting energy on climate change sceptics
scitty, but you're adamant that it CAN'T be 134 year's of data...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug