Yep I predicted this reaction from you to myself when I was posting the material yesterday.
" a little more detail in your version than was publically available via your link...."
That link was just one that I found and it happens to verify the facts that I have outlined in my posts. It is a little incorrect in the detail of the number of holes but there you go.
As I indicated before I had taken an interest in the PSV mines during the 1990's along with a number of other possibilities. I tend to jot things down and keep info for some time much to my wife's horror.
My only link to RAU is as an interested shareholder.
If you cannot accept that Ctindale's claims are so spurious that any of his claims lack any credibility then that is your problem.
"But where is the relevance to the situation that RAU has itself in now?"
Plenty of relevance since it demonstrates that John Kelly and many of his current RAU team were very effective in developing a mine from receivership through to profitability and increased the reserves and life of the mine through finding the signifcant sulphide ore below the oxide ore.
They have the pedigree of success from PSV.
If you cannot make that connection then you are wasting my time Scotmans.
"Loads of money has been spent and more is needed to keep things moving ..."
Gosh Scotmans. You amaze me. That seems to be the way with many, many, many, many junior oilers and miners until they make that discovery or manage to prove that resource that sets them up.
That is why they are speculative shares. Remember ?
Your attempt to shift the debate away from the spurious CT attacks is lamentable but predictable.
Your comments will blown away in some weeks time when the BFS for Amayapampa is announced.
I look forward to that.
watch this space (episode two) - part 3, page-3
Currently unlisted. Proposed listing date: WITHDRAWN
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?