Of course the other BIG item that will decide the feasibility of the PRL project, which I didn't include in my previous post, is the CAPEX to build the energy producing infrastructure and the H2 producing plant.
Companies that plan to produce H2 where they can access already existing green energy sources, have an advantage in that they will pay for the energy they use, but not the initial outlay to build the energy producing infrastructure (think FMG in Tasmania using hydro).
That being said, it appears that FMG are also planning to build both green energy and H2 infrastructure in WA, so it seems they think it is a financially feasible option. Of course they plan to use significant amounts of the H2 for green steel production, which will reduce costs and provide green credentials.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Watch this space for more
Of course the other BIG item that will decide the feasibility of...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 40 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PRL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
4.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $48.44M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
PRL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
TON
TRITON MINERALS LTD
Adrian Costello, Executive Director
Adrian Costello
Executive Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online