Spot on ? What part is spot on ? IMO none of this is "spot on" -...

Spot on ? What part is spot on ?

IMO none of this is "spot on" - lets dissect the Boogie post..

"They wont put them in the trains its to expensive" -

garbage. If they can trial wifi in PLANES, then trains has higher rate of turnover and will be economically viable. The main issue - IMO - is the contractuals with Governamnt agencies and vandalism potential.

"There is only 1 Box to be put in flinders st" -

yay.

"The concept is fantastic Free wifi in all major hotspots in the years to come would be great for all, however i dont think GCN will be behind it." -

based on what ? I also doubt GCN would be behind ALL major hotspots, but for the rail network they will become the leading player if they get it right !

"I dont think the trial will be successful either." -

awesome argument. Your evidence is ??

"IMO you will see the Wifi in all stations and airports but for me this wont happen for 2 years before its up and running." -

dream on. IMO, this technology (and im not talking about GCN here, just the technology) demand will accelerate.

"I think GCN have rushed into this and havnt set everything up properly." -

wow compelling argument. Your evidence ? I respectfully disagree here

"Charlie" -

finally, something you got right !!