Sure and you assume I haven't understood everything that you have said since "time immermorial?
So how pray tell is the 708 situation actually fair to all shareholders... or makes it "equitable" so that each share is worth exactly the same as the other?
When most shareholders have purchased their stock via non 708 (ie online brokers)?
Oh and sometimes the 708 situation leaves out large holding institutional holders as well..
Could it be that is one of the main reasons they never have the confidence to take an onmarket stake in such a company early on in the first place?
I mean seriously? Am I the only one here who thinks the 708 "situation" is a problem in allowing equitable and fair CR's?
Anyway...
Whatever.. ya'll 708's go on believing ya'll are super smart investors and it's that (not your 708 "advantage") that gives you the edge.... ie by allowing you to sit back and pick and chose the offers.. no matter how long you are given the advantage to wait on the profit story....all without having ZERO skin in the game and ZERO previous risk...
...believe in what ya'll want to "believe"
I simply chose to not be involved anymore in this casino of a market. (wait the casino is actually fairer) until they do something about the inequity that is Rule 7.1 and the 708 legislation.
(20min delay)