WDS too cheap?, page-417

There is much diddLEd after divy action =
I am dark on derrs in general who are weakened by the price COrruption.
Heavens above does a CO this big need do a buy back just to keep greedy funds in check ??/
Some may lobby for reign in the weird moves of greedy funds,
I believe wds needs an integral stock price, margin moving somewhat still okay based on macro or micro-MERIT.
There is no bounds to greed now=
I stand by my COmments in an earlier post where I think Meg has class and was a good vid co etc
As noomax Post #:63701234 with quality brain words stated earlier got good biggen assets @ "just right" time.
Energy is the goldilocks sector as = NEEDED DEMAND that supply struggling to meet.
As for wds and others macro =some is still to be gov written but real demand with less supply exists, recession or not.
As wds micro with new assets, the pieces are theirs. Meg I think "can do". Growth of 8+ billion =humungous
Whom doing the can-do investment (only a few ie. sto also doing Canada can do??? as where $$$ at what costs/profits/green etc
Wds is a divy cash cow in a gone commodity & needing more replacement with lagging of others both in supply & investment.
I am a believer in wds its growth, the industry, goldilocks leadership and its investment future.
I cannot sit on a stock that lacks integrity matters, I will stand and write words if my COn$cious needs,
I am still waiting, watching to see whom directs the $$$ of holders' wealths of this CO =
All that whilst the co directs its holders return of investment through their day in day out deci$ions..
As good Au$$ie co = good luck
As funds = too obvious, too greedy
Choices now and w/then=