clearly anything like that needs to be evidence-based.
I think Vocus or whoever in the t/o battle over in Perth did something similar where they sold their 10% of the target they held, (and could not vote) to institutions who could vote, and would vote in favour of the t/o.
But you are alluding to what I think is some "association" (a game-changer") - quite different.
as I mention - one needs to point to evidence
cheers
clearly anything like that needs to be evidence-based. I think...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 161 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
