That's a bit harsh.
Dino's agenda may be unknown, but at least he is trying to provide an alternative view.
I for one would be in violent agreement with Dino, if his $1 per barrel valuation yard stick proved correct for WHN.
Imagine $1 x 5B barrels of oil = $5B asset value.
I know Dino, WHN needs to give up at least 80% of it's acerage to get these barrels proved up, and it's still almost 100% unrisked.
But you have to acknowledge the upside is there for the risk.
That's a bit harsh.Dino's agenda may be unknown, but at least he...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
