Thanks for the comment,but I have stated in previous comments...

Thanks for the comment,but I have stated in previous comments that I was not in cattle,therefore the minimal statement on the cattle in detail is not required as the people, and there are lots of them were under the belief that the cattle were bought even though as you quite rightly have informed that the cattle were at this point leased,and I personaly believe it will be a contentious issue with legal argument by better people than me.
I am one of those that believe the corporation act in this whole ponzi scheme will hold water like a seive.
Therefore it would not be unreasonable to think that GTP deliberately deceived investors,advisers,contractors to GTP,leaseholders asic and it goes on.
Once again thanks for giving me a heads up
I would still suggest that cattle people talk to the feds as they are on the case,and pursue the aggi department to clarify the position in WRITING as to the status of your property I.E.cattle and where are they?

Good luck and keep records