Hi
@82Punter , I was trying to say that in the context of webinars and paid interviews he is very convincing. Going way back he had 'poolbox' and 'farmbox' etc that are essentially the same thing as being done now believe it or not. It was the language used and in my mind the potential was great back then - and did not matter if any secondary parties (Spokes) joined, it was about the primary party saving time and effort concilliating accounts etc. as the payoff - Great - buy the package and save time and money
Fast forward to now, the 'similar' softwrae (as was then) is now talking about the flow throughs generating revenue as a percent that is clipped on the way through if invoices are paid through the platform through consenting parties. SAAS was the original goal many years back but has been (IMO) thrown to the curb chasing revinue via clipping the ticket rather than an 'efficient software based accountant' (My interprative words, though perhaps GOAT could use words like this in his business language?)
Anyhow, your understanding and mine may differ, GREAT!, that is why forums such as this can be a great educator. I may well be (And probably are) wrong (Refer user name) , but I have a defensive mindset and I critically assess announcements and try to read the 'fluff' and why it is there. It is my money after all if I invest or not. And I really enjoy discussion - believe it or not
A Point of view with its own analysis behind it is a wonderful opportunity to open your own mind (IMO) to something that you may not have thought about before
Cheers and thanks for your discourse
Ballsup - By name and nature
) & their payments facilities packaged into one.
(20min delay)