I don't feel the need to respond in much detail to your post...

I don't feel the need to respond in much detail to your post because others have already eloquently stated the case for Weebit Nano in opposition to your views. I have not read the article in AFR because I don't subscribe to that rag and the article is behind a paywall. If you want me or anybody to consider the material that reportedly slanders the Weebit board members then please put up or shut up. If I ever feel an excess of funds sufficient for a subscription to AFR I will spend those funds on increasing my Weebit shareholding.

Your stated motivation "... to protect the younger more inexperienced people here ..." sounds very patronising and supercilious to me. I don't see a rush of these young investors lining up to thank you.

Do yourself a favour and do some real research into Weebit Nano, it's highly qualified and experienced board and management, its exciting and proven ReRAM memory product and its plans for great market activity and rising revenue. Start with weebit-nano.com and get some real facts instead of clickbait from some journalistic hack.