Week Ahead (9-12th June), page-98

Yes it is all at a fascinating stage.
Although end-May was suggested as a start-drill date, they also indicated that they would table a plan of drill targets in an announcement.
However since then, Sarah has been employed as a consultant and with her incredible expertise in this Kambalda morphology she will of course be running the rule over all the Talc data.
IMO, like all these things, sometimes you address them then go away and come back later for another look with a fresher mind etc... so she can take as long as she likes to get it right. Pressure should never be allowed to compromise good judgement and clear thinking. If she wants other opinions from any of her geo mates too, well great stuff. In order to wrestle this to the ground, the more inputs the better. Take a month if needed. Patience.
As a consultant, she may even take a step back and recommend some additional exploratory drilling and DHEM prior to actual target drilling. Who knows.
End May was just something for the punters and never to be taken seriously.
Yes it would be good to see a drill plan, but they only make a rod for their own backs. In a way although I am curious, I hope they just get on with it quietly and methodically, no fanfare.
If the hi-tech MLEM shows a string of conductors, right on that projected basal contact.. allowing for that laterally displacing fault.. then my money is on another Kambalda, and not an iron sulphide (yikes!) deposit. And that is without putting a drill in the ground. So I would like to see what the MLEM produced for a start anyway.