I haven't had a chance to do real research here, but can you really extend strike length to 1.2km based on rock chips? Its a little disingenuous is it not? It feels like unsuccessful drill results getting swept under the carpet. (Not that they need to do that- explorer right, you miss more than you hit that's the reality).
These guys could hit the motherload but for twice the price I've gone for a Kalahari junior for my copper exposure.
Can anyone spread some light on the M.Ds suggestions that they are looking for smaller 100Mt type deposits? I thought Chile was porphyry central which means huge deposits right?
I'm guessing here this means this means they are targeting epithermal deposits, which means lower drilling costs, higher grade deposits, with the chance to vector into a potential porphyry below that.
On the surface perhaps not a bad strategy. Can anyone confirm this?
CPO Price at posting:
4.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
