Dear ariante,Timber7 clearly stated that he would chase up KC so...

Dear ariante,

Timber7 clearly stated that he would chase up KC so as to better inform the members as to how the company and shareholders found themselves in the predicament we did. My recollection was that KC said he will be doing a BRR and he would give an explanation to Timber7 if he was permitted.

Timber7 indicated to KC that he would relay his response or his own version of events subject to KC's approval. It is most bemusing, in those circumstances, that members complain about being supplied information. Timber7's post that included KC's email didn't have to be provided until a fuller announcement in the wash up.

To which ASX rule are you referring? Or is that simply a baseless assertion by you? I think you are confusing a duty to act in the best interests of the company and a director's other duties with more general tortious duties.

In any event, please don't confuse my posts with me being happy.