Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

the french British and Americans are the onlu nukes on the...

First 100 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
MattFrost

2,881 Posts.

95

20/09/21

18:13

Post #: 56215637
Share

Originally posted by jsbuser: ↑

And you missed the point. I really dont care what parameters are perceived as better or worse for the alternatives.

We have an active contract with probably heavily penalties for termination. I dont believe that there will be just a termination for convenience clause here. As taxpayers, we need proper due process here.

DCNS makes a nuclear sub. The sub previously chosen is that sub with a different propulsion unit. At least its actually been assessed to some degree againt its competition.

Perhaps there are other nuclear subs, if the requirement has changed.

It should be contested in the market, at least if not USA/Brit vs the French sub at a minimum.

As to the current budget position of the project by DCNS, the fact its over right now does not mean the project budget wont come in later. Given the USA's appaling history of delivering military technology on time/on budget, you cant yet criticise the French at this point in proceedings and then replace them with a producer with another bad track record.

Expand

the french British and Americans are the onlu nukes on the table, and that is if the french were willing to sell their nuclear tech to start with disregarding the cancellation of the contract
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

NIM

Nimy to raise $1.21M to explore 'newsy' WA targets

AII

Almonty locks in govt agreement for tungsten oxide plant in South Korea

MDI

Nanocap Middle Island Resources kicks off Barkly copper-gold drill run – a potential IOCG-style NT project

I88

Infini soars 50% as company reveals it could’ve just made uranium history – redefining what it means to be “high grade”

Bitcoin investors need to know the risks

There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...

First 100 Last