hi art, run a couple of thoughts by you.
There has been a lot of ‘join the dots’ going on, that’s cool and discussion worthy, though IF this has substance (any of it) AND is in the public forum then is it not worthy of confirmation by OBJ BoD to its shareholders?
That any hype that has substance will be very beneficial to the sp.
If NO confirmation then does not that possibly negate the substance of its worth
Your ref to cmk as the champion of reason; now lesser because he questions the direction of the company and raises legitimate concerns ‘which’, arguably, are the exact reason why the sp of OBJ is where it is.
If his reasoning is actually correct/warranted, however ‘negative’, will it be ‘rewarded’ with many upvotes & GAs?, by and by, imo, seemingly NO, .... and from that stance actually a ‘true’ champion.
Lionheart .... from champion to ‘villain’, was he a champion of reason when he was very pro OBJ, numerous upvotes and many GAs would say he was!
Your thoughts on this ‘reasoning’, OBJ will require P&G relationship to prosper, not wane, and need multi products in the market place (3 minimum) for it to prosper, from that a river of revenue rather than the ‘current’ trickle to ensure its future.
Company, absolutely, have acquired some very creditable personal, though by the metric of the current languishing sp and its current inability to spike the sp/hype the market, it is as much the same as the previous BoD, actually the previous BoD had this stock way North in its heyday, all down since the Olympic team in place.
Despite myself, I do wonder why the market does not acknowledge the ‘potential’ of this company, it’s great but??
perhaps clarity of future funding will clear the air, i.e, raising of funds that suggest, imo, OBJ will finally and at long last finally commercialise something, anything!
Just saying art, go well.
Expand
(20min delay)