Pibroch, the real aim is to hamper policy changes that might negatively impact fossil fuel industries and major carbon emitters.
climate change deniers aren't adult enough to admit this so they aim to create doubt about the science that would be used in policy decisions.
because climate change denial is pseudoscience the alt right aren't ever go to win that argument.
and they don't have to. All they have to do is create doubt, which they do by such techniques as nit picking, cherry picking, fantasy, wrongly conflating weather and climate, amplifying short term noise instead of looking at long term trends, character assassination, funding bogus research, strawmanning, etc etc.
sadly in Australia, deniers have garnered considerable support, helped of course by News Corpse propaganda, and all the paid tongues the industry can buy.
and so we come to the endless word salad and pseudoscience Posted by the poster in question. Endless. Fully signed up to the denial conspiracy theory, rarely gives ground. Always there with another post. Must always have the last post. Many responses highly emotional because any question is a threat to the illusory safe harbour of pseudoscience. No posts on any equities. Now walking back from previously confessed links with the carbon polluters. Reckons greenhouse gases aren't greenhouse gases.
obviously not the sharpest tool in the shed so ideal for the role.
and here's a key
perates by Steve Bannon's dictum: when in doubt just fill the space with s###.
the aim: create doubt.
